Welcome to my "mind palace" and play ground. Find me here!

I just wanna express myself in a positive way ;)

State Paradigm for Stakeholder, Tariff, and Monetary.

After the so called World  War II, there is a friction of mean about state’s role in stakeholder, tariff, and monetary. In this area, the power of state not as influence as when the merchantilist was conquering the idea of economic life. There is an effort to balance the influence power between state and market so does international economic institution and state.  For example, in protectionism policy, state is expected not to do protection in international free trade. With the arrangement of Bretton Wood, its effort of super powers to “push”  state with the creation of GATT, World Bank, and IBRD (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development). These all phenomenon named as the era of embedded liberalism, when idea of liberalism implemented to many states with the emerge of those institution.

Then emerge a question, how if state still do regulation, but not become an obstacle for the liberalism, state (third emerge  countries) should still become the actor in conduct the economic policy with involve it in the arrangement,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on October 29, 2010 by in International Affairs.
%d bloggers like this: